Skip to content

Embedded Finance UX Sprint

Sprint · Hosted by Finch. Rebuilding the approval step in checkout lending so it stops losing customers.

OpenSprint Host: Finch Type: Sprint Region: Austin Reward: 30,000 EUR pilot Closes Aug 20 · 17 days left 38 participants joined

About this open call

The brief

Finch is rebuilding checkout lending, and the approval step is where shoppers leave. They want that step to stop reading as an interruption: fewer things asked at once, a sequence a shopper can follow, and the disclosures a regulated credit flow has to show placed where they can be read rather than dismissed. The sprint is scoped to the approval step alone, not to the rest of checkout.

What they're looking for

Interface work that raises completion on a regulated credit flow: a re-sequenced approval step, rewritten prompts and field labels, honest waiting and decline states, and disclosures presented in a form a shopper will actually read. It should hold up on a phone, behave sensibly when a decision takes a few seconds to come back, and keep every disclosure the current step shows rather than removing one to shorten the flow. Working prototypes and annotated screens are both fine, provided the reasoning behind each change is written down and the drop-off it targets is named.

Problem statements

Drop-off at approval

Shoppers get as far as the approval step and stop. Nothing on the screen says how long a decision takes, what it will ask for, or what happens if the answer is no, so leaving is the cheapest option in front of them.

Disclosures at the worst moment

A regulated credit flow has to show terms the shopper did not come for. They currently arrive as one block of text at the point of highest impatience, and none of them can be dropped to make the step shorter.

Waiting with no answer

A decision does not always return instantly. The step has one state for waiting and one for done, so a shopper asked to hold on cannot tell whether to stay on the page, and a decline leaves them nowhere to go next.

Evaluation criteria

How entries are scored

100% weighted total

Effect on completion30%
Clarity of the approval step25%
Feasibility & readiness20%
Handling of required disclosures15%
Team & craft10%

Timeline

  1. Jul 1, 2026

    Sprint opens

    Entries accepted from startups & partners.

  2. Aug 20, 2026

    Submissions close

    Final deadline to submit your entry.

  3. Sep 7, 2026

    Host review & shortlist

    Finch scores entries and shortlists finalists.

  4. Sep 21, 2026

    Winner announced

    The strongest entry moves to the pilot on the approval step.

Sponsors & partners

Finch

Host

Host

Northwind Retail

Sponsor, and the checkout the pilot runs in

Sponsor

Mindline

Drop-off measurement partner

Partner

FAQs

Who can take part?

Any startup or partner organisation in the ecosystem, in-house design teams included. One entry per team.

What does it cost?

Nothing. Joining the sprint commits you to nothing; only a submitted entry reaches Finch, and it reaches them after the deadline.

Do entrants see real customer or credit data?

No. You work from the flow and the states described in this brief and supply your own sample content. Nothing in the sprint gives entrants access to real applicants, accounts or credit records.

What happens after I submit?

Finch reads entries as they arrive and shortlists after the deadline; the strongest moves to the pilot. An entry is final once sent, so submitting early costs you nothing but does commit you.

Take part

Submit your entry before the deadline. Every entry is scored against the criteria above.